Forty Years: The History of Women at Bowdoin

A Class Project of GWS 280 - Fall 2011

  • Prehistory
  • Process
  • Curriculum
  • Athletics
  • Extracurriculars
  • Social Life & Fraternities
  • Women’s Resource Center
  • Timeline

The Annual Report of the Student Life Committee 1968 (excerpt: coordinate colleges)

The Student Life Committee was a board of Bowdoin faculty members who observed campus life and recommended changes they believed would improve the student culture and environment. The annual recommendations would be drafted into The Annual Report of the Student Life Committee. The report from 1968 focuses on the freshman year and the admission of women. An interesting option mentioned in the report was the establishment of a “co-ordinate college.” This excerpt omits pages 2-13 of the report in order to focus on page 14, where idea of a coordinate college is first introduced (Document SB, 8).

The committee reported three realistic avenues for admitting women to Bowdoin: adding women undergraduates to the current student body, replacing some male undergraduates with female undergraduates, or establishing a co-ordinate college for women. The section of concern on pages 19-21 introduces the admission of women through a coordinate college. Among the advantages to a coordinate women’s college was the “offering [of] unique opportunities” because there were few four-year colleges for women in Northern New England at that time. A separate institution for women would also allow Bowdoin to preserve traditions that may have been compromised by the campus’ integration.

The report also presents a series of questions about the degree to which the colleges should be separate. Would men and women share all facilities? How would both sexes be integrated in the classroom? Perhaps most importantly, how would the construction of another college campus be funded? Wealthier institutions were better suited for coordinate colleges they conclude. Finances were a significant part of Bowdoin’s decision to admit women directly to the existing campus.

The Annual Report of the Student Life Committee 1968 (excerpt: coordinate colleges) - sb-8-page-1
The Annual Report of the Student Life Committee 1968 (excerpt: coordinate colleges) - sb-8-page-1
The Annual Report of the Student Life Committee 1968 (excerpt: coordinate colleges) - sb-8-page-2
The Annual Report of the Student Life Committee 1968 (excerpt: coordinate colleges) - sb-8-page-2

 

The Annual Report of the Student Life Committee 1968 (excerpt: coordinate colleges) - sb-8-page-3
The Annual Report of the Student Life Committee 1968 (excerpt: coordinate colleges) - sb-8-page-3
The Annual Report of the Student Life Committee 1968 (excerpt: coordinate colleges) - sb-8-page-4
The Annual Report of the Student Life Committee 1968 (excerpt: coordinate colleges) - sb-8-page-4
The Annual Report of the Student Life Committee 1968 (excerpt: coordinate colleges) - sb-8-page-5
The Annual Report of the Student Life Committee 1968 (excerpt: coordinate colleges) - sb-8-page-5
The Annual Report of the Student Life Committee 1968 (excerpt: coordinate colleges) - sb-8-page-6
The Annual Report of the Student Life Committee 1968 (excerpt: coordinate colleges) - sb-8-page-6
The Annual Report of the Student Life Committee 1968 (excerpt: coordinate colleges) - sb-8-page-7
The Annual Report of the Student Life Committee 1968 (excerpt: coordinate colleges) - sb-8-page-7
The Annual Report of the Student Life Committee 1968 (excerpt: coordinate colleges) - sb-8-page-8
The Annual Report of the Student Life Committee 1968 (excerpt: coordinate colleges) - sb-8-page-8
The Annual Report of the Student Life Committee 1968 (excerpt: coordinate colleges) - sb-8-page-9
The Annual Report of the Student Life Committee 1968 (excerpt: coordinate colleges) - sb-8-page-9
The Annual Report of the Student Life Committee 1968 (excerpt: coordinate colleges) - sb-8-page-10
The Annual Report of the Student Life Committee 1968 (excerpt: coordinate colleges) - sb-8-page-10
The Annual Report of the Student Life Committee 1968 (excerpt: coordinate colleges) - sb-8-page-11
The Annual Report of the Student Life Committee 1968 (excerpt: coordinate colleges) - sb-8-page-11
The Annual Report of the Student Life Committee 1968 (excerpt: coordinate colleges) - sb-8-page-12
The Annual Report of the Student Life Committee 1968 (excerpt: coordinate colleges) - sb-8-page-12
The Annual Report of the Student Life Committee 1968 (excerpt: coordinate colleges) - sb-8-page-13
The Annual Report of the Student Life Committee 1968 (excerpt: coordinate colleges) - sb-8-page-13
The Annual Report of the Student Life Committee 1968 (excerpt: coordinate colleges) - sb-8-page-14
The Annual Report of the Student Life Committee 1968 (excerpt: coordinate colleges) - sb-8-page-14

SB 8

Filed Under: Documents, Prehistory Tagged With: 1968, SB8, Student Life Committee

Coeducational Housing Arrives at Bowdoin


Shortly after the arrival of women at Bowdoin, the question of coed housing arose, and this collection of reports and an Orient (Bowdoin’s student newspaper) article documents the process of addressing the issue. In the book Going Coed, Susan L. Poulson notes that sexual segregation “on the eve of coeducation” was extremely prevalent on college campuses, including in housing (227), and Bowdoin was certainly addressing this issue of coeducational housing. The College was only a couple of years behind Harvard, whose housing became coed in 1970, and Rutgers and Georgetown, which had introduced coed housing even earlier, in the 1960s.

As demonstrated by the Student Life Committee’s Report from November 3, 1971 (Document EN, 24.1), Bowdoin was grappling with the concept of coeducational housing within just months of the arrival of matriculating women students at the college. The committee suggests three guidelines: all students can choose between coed and single sex housing, but the College does not guarantee that those students requesting coed housing will be assigned to it; dormitories will be coed by alternating floors, but due to the ratio of men to women at the college, there will likely be three floors of men to each floor of women; first-year students can request coeducational housing, but their parents will be notified.

The student newspaper was quick to pick up on this report and also quick to criticize the second guideline regarding coeducational housing by alternate floors in an article entitled “New Coed Housing Plan: Sexes Remain Separated” from November 15, 1971 (Document EN, 24.2). Despite these criticisms, nearly a year and a half later, in March of 1973, the “Student Housing” section of another Student Life Committee Report (Document EN, 24.3) notes that coed housing had been successfully implemented, that the “vast majority” of the class of 1976 had requested it, and that there was less damage in coed dormitories. The Pierce Report of 1969, which had recommended coeducation for Bowdoin, declares that “women would undoubtedly have a ‘civilizing’ effect” at Bowdoin (31-32), but this 1974 report speculates that the decreased damage is the result, not of women having a “taming influence” on men, but of students in coed housing seeing each other “as more of a family” and the building “as more of a home.”

EN24.1 Coeducational Housing Arrives at Bowdoin
EN24.1 Coeducational Housing Arrives at Bowdoin
EN24.2a Coeducational Housing Arrives at Bowdoin
EN24.2a Coeducational Housing Arrives at Bowdoin
EN24.2b Coeducational Housing Arrives at Bowdoin
EN24.2b Coeducational Housing Arrives at Bowdoin
EN24.3a Coeducational Housing Arrives at Bowdoin
EN24.3a Coeducational Housing Arrives at Bowdoin
EN24.3b Coeducational Housing Arrives at Bowdoin
EN24.3b Coeducational Housing Arrives at Bowdoin

Filed Under: Documents, Process Tagged With: Coeducational Housing, EN24.1, EN24.2, EN24.3, Orient, Report, Student Life Committee

Addressing Women’s Security Needs

In the “Security” section of a 1973 Student Life Committee Report (Document AK, 28), the issue of campus security “as it affected women students in particular” came to the fore. Due to a number of reported “incidents,” and the fact that, with the increase in the size of the student body size, student housing was expanding further and further from the center of campus, an “escort service” – akin to today’s shuttle service – was implemented. Overall, the report recommended an increase in the total security presence on campus.

Interestingly, the need for this increase in security presence was described as a direct result of the addition of women to Bowdoin. The implication is either (or both) that women require more protection than men, and/or that men are more likely to commit crimes against women than against each other. Another interesting component is the mention of “incidents.” Though it is unclear whether these were particularly violent or sexual in nature, the type of “incidents” that might prompt a woman to seek an escort service at night were likely assault-oriented.

At the time, Bowdoin was not alone in beginning to recognize the need for sexual assault protection and support for women students. In the 1970s, feminists brought issues of sexual harassment and sexual assault to the forefront, on college campuses as well as in the larger society. In 2011, sexual assault awareness and prevention are central issues at Bowdoin, and the community has made a remarkable effort to keep this campus safe. Every year, “Consent Is Sexy Week” teaches Bowdoin students how to recognize and avoid sexual assault through various programs and events. Bowdoin’s Alliance for Sexual Assault Prevention (ASAP) is an umbrella title for the collaboration of various groups all devoted in whole or in part to these issues, including Bowdoin Men Against Sexual Violence (BMASV), VSpace, Vday, Peer Health, Safe Space, and the Bowdoin Queer Straight Alliance (BQSA).

 

AK28 -  Addressing Women's Security Needs
AK28 - Addressing Women's Security Needs

Filed Under: Documents, Process Tagged With: 1973, AK28, Report, Security, Student Life Committee

Categories

  • Athletics (9)
    • Documents (6)
    • Focus Group (1)
    • Oral History Interview (2)
  • Curriculum (8)
    • Documents (6)
    • Focus Group (1)
    • Oral History Interview (1)
  • Extracurriculars (10)
    • Documents (6)
    • Oral History Interview (3)
  • Prehistory (20)
    • Documents (18)
    • Oral History Interview (2)
  • Process (22)
    • Documents (12)
    • Focus Group (3)
    • Oral History Interview (7)
  • Social Life & Fraternities (20)
    • Documents (12)
    • Focus Group (3)
    • Oral History Interview (5)
  • Women’s Resource Center (8)
    • Documents (6)
    • Focus Group (1)
    • Oral History Interview (1)
  • Sources
  • Acknowledgments

Copyright © 2025 · research.bowdoin.edu · Powered by WordPress